Zimbabwe constitutional changes prompt quiet Harare shutdown

    Harare streets were unusually quiet after a call for a nationwide shutdown against constitutional amendments that could extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa's term until 2030.

    2 min read3 min listen

    Harare, Zimbabwe’s capital, experienced an unusually quiet day following a call for a nationwide shutdown. This action protested recent constitutional amendments. These changes could extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa's time in office until 2030.

    The streets of Harare were notably emptier than usual, particularly during the morning rush hour. This indicated a response to the shutdown call. Police deployed heavily across the city, blocking access to popular parks and parking water cannon trucks. This showed authorities were prepared for potential demonstrations, which police had banned.

    This situation fits into a broader pattern of political tension in Zimbabwe. The country has a history of contested elections and constitutional disputes. The ruling ZANU-PF party has governed since independence in 1980. Critics often accuse the party of consolidating power through legislative means. This latest amendment follows a trend of legislative changes impacting the electoral landscape.

    Farai Marapira, the ZANU-PF’s information and publicity director, stated the constitutional changes aim to address political tensions. He told Al Jazeera that the amendments would reduce periods of heightened political activity. This activity typically occurs within the five-year electoral cycle. However, opposition groups argue these changes weaken democratic accountability and allow for a potential extension of presidential power.

    The immediate implication is continued legal and political contention. Opposition groups and activists are challenging the constitutional amendments in the Constitutional Court. Decision-makers will watch the court's ruling closely. This outcome could significantly impact Zimbabwe's political future and stability. International observers will also monitor the situation for its implications on democratic governance in the region.

    The constitutional amendments, approved by Zimbabwe’s Parliament and signed into law in July, are at the heart of the dispute. These changes move the next presidential election from 2028 to 2030. They also extend presidential and parliamentary terms from five years to seven. Furthermore, they alter the method of presidential selection. Future presidents would be elected by parliament instead of directly by voters.

    President Mnangagwa came to power in 2017 after Robert Mugabe's removal. He won elections in 2018 and 2023. He was previously expected to leave office at the end of his second term in 2028. The amendments have drawn strong criticism from various groups. They argue these changes could allow Mnangagwa to remain in office beyond his expected term.

    Godfrey Gurira, a veteran of Zimbabwe’s liberation war, expressed strong disapproval. He told Al Jazeera that the changes betray the ideals he fought for. He stated, "We were fighting for one man, one vote. That’s what we want to see happening. We were not fighting for a dynasty." This sentiment highlights the deep-seated concerns among some segments of the population regarding the amendments.

    Despite the shutdown call, Harare gradually returned to its normal rhythm as the day progressed. More shops opened, taxis reappeared, and traffic increased. However, the underlying dispute over the constitutional changes remains unresolved. The legal challenge in the Constitutional Court represents the next critical phase in this ongoing political struggle. The outcome will shape Zimbabwe's governance for years to come.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH