Former Western Regional Minister Kwabena Okyere Darko-Mensah testified that he did not see key discussions. These discussions revolve around a mining concession. The concession is central to the ongoing Samreboi illegal mining case. Bernard Antwi Boasiako, known as Chairman Wontumi, faces charges along with two others.
Mr. Darko-Mensah was questioned during his cross-examination. This happened on June 1, 2026. He admitted he had no personal knowledge of events. Specifically, he did not witness conversations between Chairman Wontumi and Henry Okum. Mr. Okum is a prosecution witness for the case. The alleged assignment of the Samreboi concession is a major part of the charges. Mr. Darko-Mensah confirmed he was not present for these discussions. The court heard this admission during the defence's presentation of its case.
This case occurs against a backdrop of concerns about illegal mining in Ghana. Such activities can impact environmental resources and local economies. The legal proceedings aim to clarify the legitimacy of the concession's assignment. The outcome could impact regulatory clarity for mining rights in the region. Past government efforts have sought to curb illegal mining. These efforts often involve legal action and policy changes. Data from the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources has often highlighted the scale of the problem before 2026.
Abubakar Ibrahim reported on the proceedings for Joy News. The admission by Mr. Darko-Mensah is significant for the defence. It suggests a lack of direct evidence on this specific point for the prosecution. The defence is continuing to build its case. They are expected to call a fifth defence witness, Evans Addae. This witness will testify when the case resumes. The date for resumption is Wednesday, June 3.
The implications of this admission are important for the trial. It could weaken the prosecution's argument regarding the alleged illegal assignment. The court will consider all evidence presented. For investors and stakeholders in Ghana's natural resources sector, such trials highlight governance risks. Decisions on future mining concessions may be influenced by legal precedents. The public will watch the remaining testimony closely. The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence.