Supreme Court affirms AG's power over OSP prosecutions

    The ruling clarifies the constitutional relationship between the Attorney-General and the Office of the Special Prosecutor.

    2 min read3 min listen

    Ghana's Supreme Court has affirmed the Attorney-General's authority to discontinue prosecutions initiated by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP). This ruling establishes a significant constitutional safeguard, ensuring the Attorney-General maintains ultimate power over criminal cases in Ghana.

    Private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu described the judgment as a welcome and timely relief. He stated the decision will help keep the OSP in check. The ruling clarifies the constitutional relationship between the Attorney-General and the OSP, providing much-needed precision on their respective roles.

    This judicial pronouncement fits into Ghana's ongoing efforts to strengthen its anti-corruption framework while upholding constitutional principles. The 1992 Constitution vests the power to prosecute criminal cases solely in the Attorney-General. This ruling reinforces that fundamental legal tenet, ensuring no other entity can operate entirely independently in this domain.

    Mr. Kpebu explained that while the OSP possesses prosecutorial powers under the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959), these powers are exercised on behalf of the Attorney-General. He emphasized that any other person prosecuting a criminal case does so under the Attorney-General's ultimate authority. This means the Attorney-General can review and halt any prosecution, including those initiated by the OSP.

    The judgment creates an important constitutional check against potential abuses of prosecutorial authority by the OSP. Individuals who believe they have been unfairly targeted by the anti-graft agency can now seek redress from the Attorney-General. The Attorney-General has the power to call for a case file, review its merits, and discontinue proceedings where appropriate. This mechanism ensures accountability and prevents arbitrary actions.

    The Supreme Court's decision followed a constitutional challenge filed by private legal practitioner Noah Adamtey. Mr. Adamtey argued that Parliament could not grant independent prosecutorial powers to the OSP, citing Article 88 of the 1992 Constitution. This article explicitly vests prosecutorial authority in the Attorney-General.

    While the apex court upheld the constitutionality of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959), it clarified the scope of the OSP's powers. The court ruled that the Attorney-General's constitutional power to discontinue prosecutions remains intact. This includes cases initiated by the Special Prosecutor, solidifying the Attorney-General's supervisory role.

    The implications of this ruling are significant for Ghana's legal and governance landscape. It reinforces the Attorney-General's central role in criminal justice. Decision-makers and legal practitioners will closely monitor how this ruling impacts future anti-corruption efforts. It is expected to foster greater coordination between the OSP and the Attorney-General's office. This judicial clarity will likely influence the strategic direction of anti-corruption investigations and prosecutions moving forward.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH