The Court of Appeal has acquitted and discharged Sedina Christine Tamakloe-Attionu, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Microfinance and Small Loans Centre (MASLOC). This decision has immediately ignited a debate about the fairness of Ghana’s justice system, particularly concerning political accountability.
Andrew Agyapa Mercer, a prominent lawyer and member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), stated that Ms. Tamakloe-Attionu's release reinforces long-standing concerns about selective justice. He argued that the government appears to pursue cases involving political opponents more vigorously than those involving its own affiliates. This situation has led to public questioning of whether justice is truly impartial in Ghana.
This development fits into a broader narrative of political polarization and accusations of bias within Ghana's legal processes. Past instances of 'nolle prosequi' — a legal term meaning a prosecutor will not proceed with a case — for individuals linked to the National Democratic Congress (NDC) have fueled similar concerns. The current case adds to a pattern that critics say undermines public confidence in the judiciary's independence and impartiality.
Mr. Mercer specifically criticized the Attorney General's office for its handling of the appeal in Ms. Tamakloe-Attionu's case. He noted that an appeal had been filed as early as May 2024, but no significant action was taken until it was re-listed. Furthermore, he highlighted the Attorney General's failure to file written submissions, citing the unavailability of parts of the proceedings as the reason. This perceived inaction by the Attorney General has intensified the scrutiny of the legal process.
The Attorney General has announced plans to challenge the Court of Appeal's decision at the Supreme Court. This indicates a continued legal battle and suggests that the controversy surrounding Ms. Tamakloe-Attionu's case is far from over. The outcome of this Supreme Court challenge will be closely watched by political observers and the public alike, as it could set a precedent for future high-profile cases involving political figures.
Mr. Mercer emphasized that the NPP does not oppose holding officials accountable for their actions, including those who served in the previous Akufo-Addo administration. However, he stressed that accountability must be applied consistently and fairly, without regard to political affiliation. He argued that selective application of the law creates a perception that members of the governing party are protected, while NPP members are unfairly targeted.
The perception of selective justice can have significant implications for Ghana's democratic institutions and the rule of law. It can erode public trust in the judiciary and foster a sense of political victimisation among opposition parties. This situation could also influence future elections, as voters consider the fairness and integrity of the justice system.
The ongoing debate underscores the need for transparency and impartiality in Ghana's legal system. Ensuring that justice is administered without political interference is crucial for maintaining a stable and equitable society. The actions of the Attorney General and the judiciary in this and similar cases will continue to be a critical focus for citizens and political analysts.