The New Patriotic Party (NPP) Minority caucus in Parliament has accused the National Democratic Congress (NDC) government of a major policy reversal. They say the NDC's position on the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, widely known as the anti-LGBTQ Bill, has changed significantly since it was in opposition. The NDC had strongly pushed for the bill's approval in 2024.
The Minority stated in a June 4, 2026, release that the NDC's current actions contradict its past demands. They argue that the party is now overseeing substantial changes to the bill after assuming power. This shift in position raises questions about the ruling party's commitment and consistency on an issue it once called a national priority.
The NDC party had repeatedly criticized the previous Akufo-Addo administration for delaying assent to the bill. They used this issue extensively during the 2024 election campaigns. The NDC presented itself as a strong supporter of the legislation. This appealed to many voters concerned about cultural and religious values.
Parliament has introduced 31 amendments to the bill under the current NDC administration. The NPP Minority argues this directly conflicts with the NDC's former insistence on passing the bill in its original form. They believe these changes represent a clear departure from the party's previous strong defense of the legislation.
The Minority alleges the NDC exploited public support for the bill for political gain. They claim the party has now backed away from its promises after gaining power. Parliamentary records and public statements over the years support this sequence of events. The NPP Minority is calling for the 2024 version of the bill to be reinstated. They want it sent for presidential assent. Failure to do so will confirm concerns about the ruling party's sincerity.
This situation highlights a pattern of shifting political stances on sensitive social issues in Ghana. The value of GHS 4.2 billion in potential tourism revenue, often cited in debates about attracting Western investment, has been a backdrop to these discussions. The economic implications of such deeply divisive legislation are often debated by policymakers and international observers seeking to understand Ghana's stability and openness.