Ministerial Awards May Undermine Presidential Authority, CDD-Ghana Warns
Professor H. Kwasi Prempeh criticises excellence awards for government ministers, citing potential negative impacts on presidential decision-making and collective governmental responsibility.
Grace Adjei | StatsGH |
2 min read3 min listen
Professor Prempeh stated that such awards might interfere with a President’s private assessment of ministers. They could also complicate important decisions related to appointments and reshuffles. He gave an example of a President considering a reshuffle who then sees a minister nominated as 'best minister'. This could clash with the President's internal review, where that same minister might be considered for removal. A publicly celebrated minister could be on the President's 'cutting block' by internal standards.
These awards fit into a broader concern about how the government operates and makes decisions. Ghana's governance structure relies on the President's strong authority to appoint and dismiss ministers based on performance. The data on government efficiency and public trust often reflects how well a President can manage their team. Prior instances of ministerial reshuffles have typically been internal decisions, not influenced by external rankings. This situation highlights a potential conflict between public perception and executive control.
Professor H. Kwasi Prempeh noted his concerns on Joy News’ PM Express Business Edition. He argued that a third party publicly praising a minister above others can create unnecessary issues for presidential decision-making. He stressed that a minister who might be facing removal could suddenly be presented as the 'best minister' by an external group. These actions, he suggested, could undermine the President's ability to properly supervise and manage government appointees.
The implications extend beyond individual recognition, touching upon the principle of collective responsibility in government. Ministers work together to deliver the President's mandate, even with specific roles. Successful governance depends heavily on teamwork among ministers. Competitive award schemes could undermine this team spirit, encouraging personal ambition over collaboration. This could affect the cohesion needed to deliver on national policy objectives and economic targets.
Such awards could introduce 'perverse incentives' that lead ministers to pursue individual projects for personal gain. This pursuit of personal glory could weaken the teamwork essential for collective responsibility. Professor Prempeh acknowledged that the popularity of these awards might indicate a public desire for independent evaluations of government performance. However, he warned of the concrete negative effects on the President's ability to effectively manage the team. Policymakers and the public should watch how these external recognitions interact with established governance structures.