Politics & Policy

    Kofi Bentil warns of selective justice in Ghana

    IMANI Africa Vice President highlights concerns over political bias in government prosecutions, citing potential threats to democratic principles.

    2 min read3 min listen
    Kofi Bentil, a senior lawyer and Vice President of IMANI Africa, has publicly raised concerns about what he describes as possible selective justice under the current government. He argues that the administration’s handling of prosecutions could give credence to claims of political bias. Mr. Bentil made these remarks on JoyNews' Newsfile on Saturday, August 8, 2026, stating that accusers of selective justice have valid grounds for their claims. Mr. Bentil elaborated that two years into the administration's mandate, there are already reasons to suggest a disparity in prosecution efforts. He noted that the government appears more aggressive in prosecuting individuals associated with the opposition. Conversely, it seems more inclined to protect or free people within its own ranks. This perceived imbalance, he stated, supports the argument that selective justice may be at play. This issue fits into a broader narrative of political accountability and the rule of law in Ghana. Concerns about the fairness of legal processes can erode public trust in institutions. Such perceptions can also impact the country's democratic stability, a critical factor for economic development and investor confidence. Ghana's democratic health is frequently assessed by international bodies, with judicial independence being a key metric. “To that extent, therefore, you can claim there is selective justice,” Mr. Bentil stated during his appearance on Newsfile. He acknowledged that those who disagree could also present arguments in defence of the government. However, he maintained that the government’s record over its four-year mandate would ultimately provide the strongest evidence to support or refute these claims. Looking ahead, the government's actions in the remaining two years of its term will be closely scrutinized. Observers will watch for consistency in applying justice across the political spectrum. The outcome of high-profile cases involving both opposition and government-affiliated individuals will be particularly telling. This will influence public perception and potentially impact the upcoming general elections. Mr. Bentil also expressed broader concerns about the state of Ghana’s democracy. He cautioned against complacency, urging citizens not to wait until democratic institutions are significantly weakened before taking action. He stressed the need for constant vigilance to protect and expand the democratic space. His comments align with recent protests by the New Patriotic Party (NPP) regarding alleged selective justice and threats to democratic governance. He referred to calls for fast-tracking cases involving former officials of the NPP, including the 'Wontumi matter'. Concerns have been raised that these cases are being accelerated with the objective of securing convictions and imprisonment. Mr. Bentil emphasized that if any government attempts to undermine democratic principles, citizens have a responsibility to resist and demand accountability. The ultimate test, he suggested, would be whether similar standards of justice are applied to individuals from both major political parties. These discussions highlight the ongoing challenges in maintaining judicial impartiality within a highly politicized environment. The integrity of the legal system is paramount for Ghana's continued progress. Any perception of bias can deter foreign investment and undermine the stability of the GHS. The government's response to these allegations and its future actions will be crucial in shaping Ghana's democratic trajectory.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH