The Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) has confirmed that its ongoing statute review process is not yet finalised. This statement comes amidst concerns from the University Teachers Association of Ghana (UTAG) at KNUST regarding proposed changes to the university's governance framework.
The university's clarification directly addresses a vote by UTAG-KNUST on August 20, 2026. Members rejected proposals to replace the current election arrangements for Pro-Vice-Chancellors and Deans with appointment systems. This decision highlights a significant point of contention in the university's internal governance discussions.
This review process is a direct result of the new KNUST Act, 2025 (Act 1157), which came into force recently. The University Governing Council established a committee in March 2026 to draft new Statutes to align with this Act. This legislative update aims to modernise the university's operational and administrative guidelines, ensuring they reflect current educational and governance standards. The process involves significant stakeholder engagement, reflecting the university's commitment to inclusive decision-making.
KNUST management stated that the Academic Board formed a review committee to assess the draft Statutes. This committee is also considering all comments, suggestions, and proposals from various stakeholders. The university urges calm, advising the community to await the committee's final report to the Academic Board. This structured approach ensures all feedback is properly evaluated before any final decisions are made.
The University Teachers Association of Ghana (UTAG) at KNUST held an Emergency General Meeting on August 20, 2026. During this meeting, members voted to maintain the current election arrangements for key leadership positions. UTAG argued that broad participation, collegiality, transparency, and confidence in university leadership selection are crucial. This stance underscores the importance of democratic principles within academic institutions.
One proposal considered would have allowed the Vice-Chancellor to nominate candidates for Pro-Vice-Chancellor positions. These nominations would then be reviewed by a Search Committee. Another proposal suggested that all Deans should be appointed through a Search Committee, moving away from the current system where some Deans are elected. These proposed changes aimed to streamline leadership selection but met resistance from UTAG.
KNUST management remains committed to an open and consultative process throughout this review. The university will continue engaging relevant stakeholders as the process advances. This commitment is vital for maintaining trust and ensuring the final Statutes are widely accepted. The university appreciates the patience, cooperation, and constructive contributions from staff, students, and alumni.
The objective of this extensive review is to produce a robust, legally sound, and forward-looking set of Statutes. These new Statutes are intended to serve the long-term interests of the university community. The review committee is expected to submit its report to the Academic Board soon. Following this, the draft will proceed to the Governing Council for consideration and possible approval. This multi-stage approval process ensures thorough scrutiny and broad consensus.