Kenneth Ashigbey denies influencing Wontumi trial, refutes judge relationship claims

    Ghana Chamber of Mines CEO dismisses allegations of bias in high-profile illegal mining case.

    2 min read3 min listen

    Ing. Kenneth Ashigbey, Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Chamber of Mines, has vehemently denied allegations that his relationship with the trial judge influenced the outcome of the illegal mining case involving Bernard Antwi-Boasiako, known as Chairman Wontumi. The Accra High Court recently convicted and sentenced Chairman Wontumi to 20 years' imprisonment for illegal mining activities on the Samreboi concession. Mr. Ashigbey stated on July 21, 2026, that reports suggesting he expressed confidence in Wontumi's conviction due to the judge being his sister-in-law are entirely false.

    Mr. Ashigbey described these claims as "fabrication," asserting he never made such a statement. He clarified that the concluded criminal trial, which resulted in Wontumi's conviction, is distinct from a separate petition he filed with legal practitioner Martin Kpebu, governance advocate Edem Senanu, and Dr. Kwame Asiedu. This petition, concerning illegal mining, is still pending before another court and has not yet been heard on its merits. Linking the two cases, he argued, is a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.

    This denial comes amidst heightened public scrutiny of illegal mining, locally known as 'galamsey,' which continues to pose significant environmental and economic challenges in Ghana. The government has intensified efforts to combat the menace, leading to several high-profile arrests and convictions. Mr. Ashigbey's consistent advocacy for stringent penalties against illegal mining kingpins since 2017 aligns with broader public sentiment for accountability in the sector. His involvement in anti-galamsey campaigns has positioned him as a prominent voice in the fight against illicit mining activities.

    Mr. Ashigbey emphasized that he was not a party to the concluded criminal trial, thus precluding any conflict of interest. He condemned the practice of involving judges' names and family relationships in propaganda, stating it undermines public confidence in the justice system. "Dragging judges' names and family relationships into propaganda to discredit court decisions undermines confidence in our justice system and must be condemned," he stated. This statement underscores the importance of maintaining the integrity and impartiality of Ghana's judicial processes.

    The implications of such claims extend beyond individual reputations, potentially eroding trust in the judiciary and the broader fight against illegal mining. Stakeholders, including investors and environmental groups, will closely watch how these allegations are addressed and how the legal system responds to attempts to discredit its rulings. The ongoing efforts to combat galamsey require unwavering public confidence and a transparent legal framework. Decision-makers must ensure that the focus remains on prosecuting illegal mining activities effectively and fairly, without succumbing to misinformation.

    Mr. Ashigbey reiterated his long-standing position that those who organize, finance, and benefit from illegal mining should face the maximum penalties prescribed by law. He urged the public to disregard the false and misleading claims and instead concentrate on the collective effort to eradicate illegal mining. The conviction of high-profile individuals like Chairman Wontumi signals a strong stance against galamsey, but the integrity of the legal process must remain uncompromised to ensure lasting impact and public support.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH