Only 35 percent of Ghanaians surveyed trust the courts, according to recent findings cited by Johnson Asiedu Nketia, National Chairman of the National Democratic Congress (NDC). This low level of public confidence, revealed in the Afrobarometer Round 10 survey, poses a significant challenge to the judiciary's role in protecting Ghana's democracy.
Mr. Asiedu Nketia made these remarks on Tuesday, August 11, 2026, at the 2026 Goodluck Jonathan Foundation Democracy Dialogue in Bauchi, Nigeria. He argued that judicial independence must be matched by accessible, timely, and credible justice. Courts cannot effectively defend democracy if citizens perceive them as inaccessible, inconsistent, or vulnerable to political influence.
This concern about judicial trust fits into a broader narrative of institutional strengthening necessary for Ghana's democratic stability. The judiciary plays a critical role in resolving political disputes and protecting constitutional rights. Previous presidential election petitions in 2012 and 2020 demonstrated the courts' function in managing major political disagreements, moving them from the streets to the courtroom. Despite compliance with these decisions, public perception remains a crucial factor in the judiciary's long-term legitimacy.
Mr. Asiedu Nketia stressed that legitimate criticism is part of constitutional democracy, distinguishing it from intimidation or personal attacks. He stated, "Judicial independence means freedom from political, financial and personal influence, but it does not mean freedom from ethical standards, transparency, consistency or public accountability." This highlights the need for a judiciary that is both independent and accountable to the public.
The Afrobarometer survey further indicated that half of respondents were not confident an ordinary person could obtain justice. Only 37 percent believed they could afford to take a legal problem to court. Additionally, only 38 percent believed a case would be resolved within a reasonable period. These figures underscore significant barriers to justice for many Ghanaians.
To address these issues, Mr. Asiedu Nketia called for measures to improve access to justice. These include strengthening legal aid and making reliable information about court performance publicly available. He also advocated for transparent criteria for judicial appointments and promotions, alongside the prompt publication of constitutional judgments. These steps aim to rebuild public trust and enhance the judiciary's effectiveness.
Ghana, like many African nations, requires a judiciary strong enough to restrain governments and protect fundamental rights. However, courts must also avoid becoming "alternative political chambers," as cautioned by Mr. Asiedu Nketia. He emphasized that the judiciary must combine courage with restraint, ensuring decisions are based on legal principles rather than political preferences.
The NDC Chairman concluded that the judiciary's strongest protection lies in public confidence, not political goodwill. He urged political parties, courts, electoral bodies, civil society, the media, and academic institutions to engage in regular dialogue. This proactive engagement, he believes, can prevent political disputes from escalating into crises, fostering a more robust democratic environment. Strengthening judicial institutions is a shared responsibility, involving all stakeholders in Ghana's political landscape.