Moses Foh-Amoaning, Executive Secretary of the National Coalition for Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, has strongly advised African legislators against accepting the premise that LGBTQ+ rights are grounded in international human rights law. Speaking at the 4th Inter-Parliamentary Conference on Family, Sovereignty and Values on Thursday, June 4, 2026, he described such advocacy as deceptive.
Mr. Foh-Amoaning told conference participants that claims linking LGBTQ+ rights to established international legal frameworks are misleading. He explicitly stated, "Don’t be fooled by the human rights argument. It is a lie from hell." He characterized groups promoting LGBTQ+ rights as pursuing a clear agenda, with deception as their primary tactic. He aims to expose this strategy.
The debate over LGBTQ+ rights has significant implications for Ghana's relationship with international bodies and its own legal framework. Ghana has seen considerable political and social discourse surrounding the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill. This bill, if passed, would impose strict penalties on LGBTQ+ individuals and activities. International human rights organizations have voiced concerns, arguing the bill violates fundamental rights and may conflict with Ghana's international commitments. However, proponents, like Mr. Foh-Amoaning, argue that such rights are not universally accepted international norms.
According to Mr. Foh-Amoaning, references to sexual rights, constitutional rights, and human rights in favour of LGBTQ+ issues lack international legal basis. He asserted that "when you hear them talking about human rights, sexual rights, and constitutional rights, it’s all false." He further encouraged lawmakers not to fear potential conflicts with international law by opposing LGBTQ+ rights. He maintains that these rights were not originally part of international legal instruments but were introduced through interpretation and external influence.
The conference brought together parliamentarians, policymakers, and advocates from various nations. Their discussions focused on family values and national sovereignty. The stance taken by African legislators at such forums could influence future legal interpretations and international relations regarding LGBTQ+ rights across the continent. Decisions made here might impact trade agreements, foreign aid, and diplomatic ties.
The core issue for Ghana remains balancing its cultural values with evolving global norms. The economic impact could stem from potential sanctions or boycotts by countries or organisations that support LGBTQ+ rights. Conversely, defying international pressure might strengthen a nation's perceived sovereignty. The debate highlights a tension between universal human rights principles and specific national or cultural interpretations.
Mr. Foh-Amoaning's statements align with a segment of Ghanaian society and political leadership that prioritizes traditional family structures. His arguments suggest a deliberate effort to counter the influence of international advocacy groups. These groups often use financial leverage and diplomatic pressure to advocate for policy changes. The 4th Inter-Parliamentary Conference on Family, Sovereignty and Values serves as a platform for nations to articulate their positions on these sensitive matters.
The implications for Ghana's legislative agenda and international standing are substantial. By challenging the international human rights basis of LGBTQ+ advocacy, Mr. Foh-Amoaning seeks to build a stronger domestic case for the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill. Lawmakers who heed his advice might feel more empowered to pass legislation that aligns with his views, potentially leading to renewed international scrutiny and debate. The future trajectory of LGBTQ+ rights in Ghana and other African nations may depend on how consistently these legislators resist external pressures and uphold their perceived national values.