The Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council has demanded an apology from Linda Ahenkora, the District Chief Executive (DCE) for Akyemansa District. The Council accuses Ms. Ahenkora of unlawful intrusion into chieftaincy affairs. This includes attempting to confer paramountcy status on the Etwereso Stool.
The chiefs have also directed the DCE to withdraw a letter dated July 7, 2026. This letter, according to the Council, purports to elevate the Etwereso Stool. The Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council, in its letter dated August 12, 2026, accused the DCE of aligning with Etweresohene Ofosu Kwabi. The Council described Ofosu Kwabi as a “secessionist” and stated the DCE unlawfully recognized him. They claim she elevated him to traditional council status.
This dispute highlights the ongoing tension between traditional authority and modern governance structures in Ghana. Chieftaincy institutions play a crucial role in local administration and conflict resolution. Any perceived encroachment by political appointees can destabilize local governance. The incident underscores the delicate balance required to maintain peace and order in communities. It also brings into focus the clear separation of powers regarding chieftaincy matters. Ghana's Constitution protects the institution of chieftaincy from political interference. This protection is vital for its continued relevance and authority.
D.M. Ofori-Atta, the State Secretary, signed the Council's letter. He stated that a District Chief Executive cannot confer paramount status. This applies even under the pretext of maintaining public peace or administrative clarity. Mr. Ofori-Atta emphasized that the administration and recognition of chiefs fall under chieftaincy institutions. These are constitutionally and legally established bodies. They are not the responsibility of Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Chief Executives (MMDCEs).
The Council further argued that a DCE cannot confer chieftaincy titles. They cannot determine disputed customary status or confer paramount ranks. They also cannot decide the allegiance of chiefs through an unlawful exercise of executive fiat. The chiefs cited Article 270(2) of the 1992 Constitution. This article prohibits even Parliament from enacting laws that undermine the dignity of chieftaincy. It prevents Parliament from granting power to recognize or withdraw recognition from a chief. This constitutional provision reinforces the autonomy of traditional institutions.
The Traditional Council also clarified its position on the Etwereso Stool. It stated that it has not appointed any person as Regent for the Etwereso Stool. Mr. Ofori-Atta explained that a purported appointment was an inadvertent omission. This was corrected after being brought to the attention of chiefs at a State Council meeting. The Council maintains that the Etwereso Stool is a sub-stool of the Benkum Division. This division falls under the Ofori Panin Stool. The Okyenhene remains committed to resolving the matter peacefully.
This incident could lead to further legal or administrative actions. It may prompt a review of the boundaries of authority between DCEs and traditional councils. Decision-makers will closely watch the response from the Akyemansa DCE. The outcome could set a precedent for similar disputes across Ghana. It will also test the resolve of traditional authorities to protect their constitutional mandate. The situation underscores the need for clear communication and respect for established protocols. This is essential between local government and traditional leaders. Failure to resolve this amicably could escalate tensions. It could also disrupt local development efforts in the Akyemansa District. The Council's warning of escalation to appropriate authorities indicates their seriousness. This could involve higher traditional bodies or even the courts. The integrity of chieftaincy institutions is at stake.