The Trump administration has recently considered cutting ties with the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR). This potential move has prompted a significant campaign by diplomats and UN officials to persuade the United States to maintain its support. Sources familiar with the matter confirmed these deliberations, indicating a serious threat to the agency's operations.
The possible withdrawal of US funding stems from a disagreement over the appointment of UNHCR's deputy high commissioner. The agency had reportedly informed supporters that it could face a US blacklist, ending all financial contributions. Washington might also withdraw from UNHCR's governing Executive Committee, further isolating the agency. This dispute highlights growing tensions between the US administration and international bodies.
This development fits into a broader pattern of the Trump administration reducing funding for UN agencies and withdrawing from international entities. Since beginning his second term last year, President Trump has cut funding for various UN bodies, including the World Health Organisation. This trend reflects a shift in US foreign policy, prioritizing national interests over multilateral cooperation. Such actions have significant implications for global humanitarian efforts and international relations.
A State Department spokesperson stated there have been no changes to Washington's engagement with UNHCR. The spokesperson added that the US works with UNHCR when it advances US foreign policy interests or saves lives. They also noted that the US continues to evaluate its role in international organizations, referencing a February 2025 Executive Order to review US participation and funding. This statement suggests ongoing internal discussions within the US government.
Any end to US funding would severely weaken UNHCR, especially at a time of near-record levels of global displacement. Long-running conflicts in Ukraine and Sudan have exacerbated the refugee crisis, increasing the demand for UNHCR's services. Diplomats and aid officials warn that a US withdrawal would deepen the agency's existing financial crisis. UNHCR already faced a 30% funding drop in 2025 compared to 2024, leading to thousands of job cuts.
The dispute centers on the appointment of Tressa Rae Finerty as UNHCR's deputy high commissioner last month. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih chose Finerty. This decision was made over Simon Hankinson, a US-backed candidate who accused UNHCR of pursuing a “mass migration agenda.” This leadership dilemma underscores the ideological differences at play.
The United States was the top donor to UNHCR in 2025, contributing $868 million. This amount represented about a quarter of the agency's total contributions. A full US withdrawal would not only create a massive funding gap but also undermine support for the 1951 Refugee Convention. This convention is the cornerstone of the post-war refugee protection system, and its weakening could have far-reaching consequences for refugee rights globally.
The implications of a US withdrawal are profound. It would likely force UNHCR to make further drastic cuts to its programs and staff, impacting millions of vulnerable refugees worldwide. Other donor nations might also reconsider their contributions, creating a domino effect. Decision-makers and markets will closely watch how these diplomatic efforts unfold and whether the US ultimately decides to maintain its crucial support for global refugee protection.