Dodowa Forest cleared for interim market amid protests

    Residents, environmentalists, and traditional leaders demand immediate halt to destruction of 200-year-old historic site.

    2 min read4 min listen
    Clearing has begun on a section of the Dodowa Forest to build a temporary market, triggering strong protests from local residents, traditional leaders, and environmental groups. They demand an immediate stop to the work. This destruction of the forest, which is over 200 years old, is meant to create space for traders displaced during the redevelopment of the main Dodowa Market. The main market will become a 24-hour economic hub. Residents and other stakeholders acknowledge the potential economic benefits of the market redevelopment project. However, they insist these benefits should not come at the expense of the forest. The Dodowa Forest is central to their cultural, historical, and environmental heritage. It is a sacred site with deep roots in the community's identity. The felling of trees in the Dodowa Forest highlights a recurring challenge in Ghana. Economic progress often clashes with environmental protection and cultural preservation. Ghana, like many developing nations, faces pressure to modernize infrastructure and create jobs. But these goals sometimes overlook the long-term environmental costs and the value of historical sites. Balancing these competing interests is crucial for sustainable development. Mr. Bright Adjartey Apperkon, spokesperson for the Apperkon Family, confirmed clearing activities are underway. His family owns a substantial part of the market land. Mr. Apperkon alleged that Madam Linda Akweley Ocloo, the Member of Parliament for Shai-Osudoku and Greater Accra Regional Minister, ordered the use of forest land for the temporary market. He stated, “I visited the area and saw that part of the forest had been cleared and blocks laid. This is the destruction of our heritage, customs, and traditions.” This dispute has significant implications for local land use and environmental policy. It forces a public debate on how Ghana prioritizes development projects against its ecological and cultural assets. The outcry could prompt a review of the decision to use the forest land. It might also lead to greater scrutiny of similar urban development plans nationwide. Decision-makers will need to address the concerns of the community and environmental advocates. Dr. Gloria Djaney Djagbletey, a former Principal Research Scientist at the CSIR-Forestry Research Institute, emphasized the forest’s ecological importance. She explained that the forest provides food and medicinal resources. It also acts as a windbreak, supports biodiversity, and helps with rainfall. The forest filters water, prevents erosion, and reduces pollution. Rev. Jonathan Obour-Wiredu, Greater Accra Regional Manager of the Forestry Commission, warned that clearing the forest removes topsoil. This ultimately shortens human lifespan by altering beneficial microclimatic conditions. The Dodowa Forest once covered approximately 320 acres. Encroachment has already reduced it to just a few acres. It is historically significant as the battleground of the Katamanso War (18241826). Allied Ga-Dangbe and coastal tribes defeated Ashanti forces there. Under previous Greater Accra Regional Minister, Nii Kwartei Titus Glover, encroachers were removed, trees were planted, and the forest was declared a security zone. The current actions reverse these protective measures. This raises questions about consistent government policy on environmental conservation. Mr. Renner Awatey Kwesi Noah, a royal, described the forest as the cultural backbone of the Shai people. He warned that using the site for a market would cause sanitation and environmental degradation. The debate over the Dodowa Forest is likely to intensify. It may push for clearer guidelines on development in ecologically sensitive areas. This situation highlights the need for comprehensive environmental impact assessments before commencing such projects. It also stresses the importance of community involvement in land-use decisions.

    Comments

    More from StatsGH